16 Jun 2012: Dick on a Wire
Posted by: Frank Moraes
My father seemed to be impressed with Nik Wallenda's upcoming high wire walk over Niagara Falls. It seems really boring to me. I just can't see it as much of anything after seeing Man on a Wire a couple of years ago. So I forced my father to watch it. He was very impressed, but still looked forward to Wallenda's walk.The main thing I remembered about the film was that while Philippe Petit had all charges dropped against him after his walk between the Twin Towers. His co-conspirators, on the other hand, were thrown out of the country. In fact, there is a remarkable moment late in the movie where a police officer comments on the wire the group had put up, "The rigging outfit itself, it's magnificent the way he did it." The way he did it. Well, he didn't do it. If he had been alone, he could not have done it. The walk required a group of committed people. But in America, all that matters is the guy in front of the camera. No one else matters.
What I most noticed this time is what an asshole Petit is. He treats his friends very badly. And I feel that to all of the people involved there was a feeling that Petit was never really much of a friend. He was a fun and interesting guy to be around. He is a symbol of a great thing they were involved in. But they can't miss the personal relationship they had with him, because they never had a personal relationship with him in the first place.
I'm glad that people like Petit are around. He makes life interesting. But he doesn't make it true or deep—even for those who are physically close to him. He is the personification of the lonely man on a wire pretending that he willed the wire from his mind.

karl paniczny wrote:
Initially, I didn't notice the same issue as you did. But, I definitely understand and find valid your point. It's probably one of the reasons I kept thinking Petit was *such* a "dick"?
Reading your article, I was reminded of our conversation on how the famous/successful (not to mention 'mega-wealthy' and 'privileged') seem to believe their accomplishments are "ALL their own". We were speaking on the 'Libertarian mindset' at the time but, I think you demonstrate, quite nicely, why and how the public seem to 'buy into' this same idea as well?
When you wrote how the documentary, and nearly everyone in it, seemed under the impression Petit was: the whole performance, you illuminated this very common misconception. . .I think the confusion is partially understandable? While it's true Petit had the 'dream' to perform the stunt and actually took the most obvious physical 'risk'-you're correct to point out a general lack of interest and curiosity in his 'crew'. For without them, and their technical know-how, he probably wouldn't have even boarded a plane to NYC; let alone tight-walk between the Twin Towers.
Another insightful point!